Thursday, January 26, 2012

Our friend, confabulation


"A ship out on the ocean."

When I was teaching genre writing, I would say this line to the class, wait a couple of seconds, then say it again, just in case anyone had missed it.

Then I would ask if everyone had a mental image of a ship out on the ocean.  And, yes, everyone did.

I would then do a "hands up" session:  "hands up, everyone who saw a sailing ship."  A few hands would go up.

"Hands up everyone who saw a warship."  Another few, usually all male.

"A tanker or freighter?"  "A yacht?"

And so it would go.  I'd ask if the ship was coming toward them or sailing away or going left-to-right or right-to-left.

Was the sea calm, choppy, stormy?  Was it day or night?

Each person had a well realized image of a certain kind of ship on a certain kind of sea, doing this or that, under sun or moon or cloud.

But none of that extra information was included in "a ship out on the ocean."  So where did it come from?

From the writer's invaluable friend:  confabulation.

Confabulation is a deeply human quality, although we surely had it even before we became human.  It's the inherent power of the mind to take a small piece of information and fit it into its more complete context.

It was the power that let us glimpse a sliver of yellow or orange through a screen of leaves and know that the full image was of a piece of fruit that we could eat.  Or to see a tawny patch between the stalks of the long grass and know that it was a lion that could eat us.

It's also the power that, in a famous psychology experiment, convinced several students in a classroom that the person who had just burst in, threatened the professor, then run out again had been brandishing a gun.  In fact, it had been the professor's grad student assistant wielding a banana.  But, because the situation seemed to call for a gun, the beguiled undergrads' minds had conjured one up.

Interesting stuff, confabulation, and part of the reason why the courts are now understanding that they can't rely on eye-witness identification as iron-clad evidence.

But, to come back to writing, the reason why confabulation is our friend is because it means we don't have to create long, tedious descriptions of our characters and settings.  Instead, we need only concentrate on the few details that will become the dots our readers connect for themselves.

An old king on an even older throne, with hands that knew how to grasp and ears tuned against flattery.  For most readers, that's all that's needed.  Now show the king in action, doing what he does that makes him who he is -- and especially what part he plays in the story -- and you can get on with telling the tale. 

All the rest of it -- the lines on his face, the crown on his snowy hair, the brocaded robe, the carvings on the throne, the throne room itself -- will be confabulated-in by each reader.  They will, like the ships and the ocean, be different as to detail.  But that doesn't matter, does it?

It doesn't matter, because this is no real-world king that needs to be described accurately.  It is only a character that exists in the reader's mind while reading the story, and perhaps in moments of reflection when the book is closed and put on the shelf.

So choose your details carefully, get them down, and keep the story moving.  Let confabulation do the heavy lifting for you.






8 comments:

  1. I use this extensively, but you'd be amazed how often I get crits on it in writing groups.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, you will. I've been in some writers groups, and not everything you hear is useful -- unless, of course, one day you write a story about a writers group.

      Some writers seem to believe that characters have to have some kind of an independent existence. If they ever find one, I'd like them to send it over to me. It would be fascinating to examine one in the real world, assuming it wasn't too dangerous.

      In genre fiction, all that really counts is story -- the getting from here to there and what it all sums up as. Characters are story elements, and we only need to know about them the things that let them do their job properly in the story. Everything else, the reader may infer.

      Delete
    2. This is brill. Do you mind if I quote you (with attribution and link!) on a couple of other sites?

      Delete
  2. I remember doing this with you at a writer's conference in Penticton BC. This does work very well, and it's really funny how much your mind fills in!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good stuff Matt . I too recall this at one of your North Island College lectures. Just got another short story accepted...coming out in Paragon Press in April.

    ReplyDelete